Peer Review Process
All submitted manuscripts are evaluated through a double-blind peer review process and are assessed by a minimum of two independent reviewers. The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision to accept or reject a manuscript, taking into account the reviewers’ reports and the discussion held in an editorial board meeting. All manuscripts are also screened for potential plagiarism using Turnitin.
Review Process:
- Manuscripts approved for review by the editorial board are forwarded to reviewers.
- Reviews are completed within the specified timeline, typically around one month; if additional time is required, reviewers are expected to notify the editorial secretariat in advance.
- Reviewers conduct their assessment in accordance with the journal’s author and style guidelines.
- Reviewers examine the manuscript’s content carefully to ensure clarity, accuracy, and the intended meaning of the text.
- Reviewers verify the relevance and correctness of citations and check alignment between in-text citations and the reference list.
- Reviewers provide clear written notes and recommendations to help authors improve the manuscript.
- Reviewer reports are submitted to the Editor-in-Chief or Managing Editor by completing and returning the journal’s review form.
