Hybrid Da’wah and Embodied Religious Authority: Kyai’s Dialogical Responses to Extremist Narratives in Semi-Rural Indonesia

Authors

  • Syarifudin Zuhri Universitas Sunan Drajat, Lamongan
  • Nilna Dzakiyyah Universitas Sunan Drajat, Lamongan
  • M. Sena Horison Universitas Sunan Drajat, Lamongan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38073/wasilatuna.v9i2.4876

Keywords:

hybrid da’wah, embodied religious authority, dialogical communication, religious moderation, extremist narratives

Abstract

This study examines how kyai and Islamic preachers in two semi-rural districts of Lamongan, Indonesia, combine dialogical communication, moral exemplarity, and selective digital outreach when responding to religious narratives they regard as extremist. A qualitative descriptive design drew on observations of more than 15 religious gatherings, 14 semi-structured interviews with six kyai/preachers and eight congregation members, and documentation of offline and online da’wah practices. Data were organized using the interactive procedures of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña and interpreted thematically. Four themes emerged: (1) dialogical persuasion described as building relational trust; (2) visible moral conduct perceived as supporting religious credibility; (3) the use of WhatsApp, Facebook, and YouTube to extend existing relationships and circulate moderate messages; and (4) community-based responses constrained by limited digital literacy. The findings suggest that digital da’wah amplifies, rather than replaces, authority grounded in offline relationships and moral exemplarity. The study proposes that embodied religious authority and social embeddedness help explain the credibility of hybrid da’wah in semi-rural Muslim communities. As audience attitudes and radicalization outcomes were not measured, the findings indicate perceived communicative capacities rather than demonstrated preventive effects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aisyah, U. (2024). Peningkatan pemahaman moderasi beragama bagi takmir masjid dalam menangkal paham radikalisme [Improving understanding of religious moderation among mosque administrators to counter radicalism]. PERDIKAN (Journal of Community Engagement), 6(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.19105/pjce.v6i1.11021

Aldhaheri, W., Mashaqba, B., Alzaidi, M., Al Kaabi, M., & Aldahmani, F. (2026). Language, religion and society in intercultural contexts: A discourse-pragmatic study of persuasion strategies in Friday sermons at Sheikh Zayed Grand mosque. Cogent Social Sciences, 12(1), 2647493. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2026.2647493

Ali, N., Afwadzi, B., Abdullah, I., & Mukmin, M. I. (2021). Interreligious literacy learning as a counter-radicalization method: A new trend among institutions of Islamic higher education in Indonesia. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 32(4), 383–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2021.1996978

Alsaeed, G. R. (2026). Signalling credibility: Culture, religion, and ethics in saudi influencer marketing. Research in Globalization, 100362. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590051X26000304

Alvian, R. A. (2023). How extremist movements delegitimise religious moderation campaigns: A case of Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (2018–2022). Perspectives on Terrorism, 17(3), 23–41. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27255603

Andok, M. (2024). The impact of online media on religious authority. Religions, 15(9), 1103. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/9/1103

Bradshaw, C., Atkinson, S., & Doody, O. (2017). Employing a Qualitative Description Approach in Health Care Research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 4, 2333393617742282. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393617742282

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846

Dharta, F. Y., Oktavian, W., & Susanto, T. (2026). Meaning-making and religious authority through digital communication among rural Tuan Gurus in Lombok, Indonesia. Howard Journal of Communications. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2026.2729164

Effendi, D. I., Sarbini, A., & Rahman, M. T. (2026). Plural paths to faith: Matching preaching modalities with society’s multifaceted religious needs. Cogent Social Sciences, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2026.2698392

Faisal, A., Pabbajah, M., Abdullah, I., Muhammad, N. E., & Rusli, M. (2022). Strengthening religious moderatism through the traditional authority of kiai in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2150450

Febrian, H. (2024). Visualizing Authority: Rise of the Religious Influencers on the Instagram. Social Media + Society, 10(4), 20563051241286850. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241286850

Han, J., & Balabanis, G. (2024). Meta-analysis of social media influencer impact: Key antecedents and theoretical foundations. Psychology & Marketing, 41(2), 394–426. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21927

Hasan, Moh. F. (2025). Educational authority and regulatory legitimacy: Comparing normative systems in pesantren and public schools in Indonesia. Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis, 57(2–3), 182–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/27706869.2025.2556586

Hosseini, M., & Haukås, Å. (2025). Beyond Macroethics: Developing an Ethical Framework for Interview Data Collection and Analysis to Acknowledge Participant Rights. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23(3), 977–995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09594-9

Jaffrey, S., Rofhani, R., & Rafsadie, I. (2026). Reluctant Spies: The Role of Neighbourhood Leaders in Indonesia’s PVE Strategy. Terrorism and Political Violence, 38(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2024.2423674

Lane, A. B. (2020). The dialogic ladder: Toward a framework of dialogue. Public Relations Review, 46(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101870

Miller, S., Menard, P., Bourrie, D., & Sittig, S. (2024). Integrating truth bias and elaboration likelihood to understand how political polarisation impacts disinformation engagement on social media. Information Systems Journal, 34(3), 642–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12418

Nu’man, A. (2025). From authority to institutional trust: A study of kyai modalities in pesantren communities. Pedagogik: Jurnal Pendidikan, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.33650/pjp.v12i1.11063

Rofiqi, Zainiyati, H. S., Niam, K., & Kusaeri. (2026). Living under the gaze: An ethnographic study of authority, embodied learning, and social reproduction in Indonesian pesantren educational practices. Ethnography and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2026.2614516

Schmidt, W., & Miles, M. R. (2017). Religious identity and descriptive representation. Politics and Religion, 10(1), 186–221. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-religion/article/religious-identity-and-descriptive-representation/2BEAE50288915EAFD3B21CD2828B2E5C

Suharto, S., Hasriani, H., Abu, A., & Manaf, H. A. (2026). Strategic Da’wah Communication of Dewan Masjid Indonesia in Strengthening Religious Moderation at the Community Level. Nyimak: Journal of Communication, 10(1), 217–248. https://jurnal.umt.ac.id/index.php/nyimak/en/article/view/15341

Suresman, E., & Faqihuddin, A. (2026). From traditional religious leader to actor of social change: A comprehensive systematic literature network analysis the role of a kyai in Indonesia based on Scopus database. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2026.2625597

Tahir, M., Maulida, S., Wijaya, I. S., & Handari, S. (2025). The Role of Traditional Authority of Islamic Religious Figures in Strengthening Religious Moderation in Local Communities. Pharos Journal of Theology, 106(106.5), 1–14. https://www.academia.edu/download/125227761/article_3_106_5_november_2025.pdf

Temraz, Y., Al Salem, T., Al Nufaie, Y., Aaltaza, A., Almandoor, M., Al-Subaie, T., Alshalawi, S., Alsaadoon, S., Al Hussein, A., & Aldakhil, M. (2026). Developing a rehabilitation intervention difficulty index: A mixed-methods study using NASA-TLX and Borg RPE in a tertiary clinical setting. Public Library of Science, San Francisco, CA USA, 21(1), e0340770. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0340770

Treacy, S., Reed, A., & Glazzard, A. (2026). A systematic integrative review of counter-messaging communication campaigns targeting terrorism or violent extremism. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 18(3), 330–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2024.2419390

Wahid, S. H., & Abdulloh, S. (2026). Digital Islamic authority: A revolutionary shift or mere hype? a systematic review. SN Social Sciences, 6(2), 62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-026-01328-5

Wertgen, A. G., & Richter, T. (2023). Source credibility and plausibility are considered in the validation of textual information: Evidence from a social media context. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2022.2149757

Widjanarko, P., Chusjairi, J. A., & Sunaryo. (2025). “Immunizing” communities: Social media and preventing/countering violent extremism initiatives by former terrorists. Frontiers in Communication, 10, 1593509. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/communication/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1593509/full

Wolfowicz, M., Hasisi, B., & Weisburd, D. (2022). What are the effects of different elements of media on radicalization outcomes? A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews: Better Evidence for a Better World, 18(2), cl2.1244. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1244

Wolfowicz, M., Litmanovitz, Y., Weisburd, D., & Hasisi, B. (2021). Cognitive and behavioral radicalization: A systematic review of the putative risk and protective factors. Campbell Systematic Reviews: Better Evidence for a Better World, 17(3), cl2.1174. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1174

Zaimina, A. B. (2025). Addressing digital religious polarization: Policy analysis of religious moderation narratives on Indonesian government social media. Al’Adalah, 28(1), 19–40. https://aladalah.lppmuinkhas.com/aladalah/article/view/572

Zhou, A., & Xu, S. (2022). Computer mediation vs. Dialogic communication: How media affordances affect organization-public relationship building. Public Relations Review, 48(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102176

Zhou, C., & Chang, Q. (2024). What you perceive is what you get: Enhancing rumor-combating effectiveness on social media based on elaboration likelihood model. Social Media + Society, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241288809

Downloads

Published

20-10-2026

Issue

Section

Articles