Leadership Message in Buya Hamka Movie Season 1 (Semiotic Analysis of Leadership Message in Buya Hamka Movie Season 1)

Teddy Khumaedi Teddy Khumaedi

doi:10.38073/wasilatuna.v8i02.2504

Leadership Message in Buya Hamka Movie Season 1 (Semiotic Analysis of Leadership Message in Buya Hamka Movie Season 1)

Authors

Teddy Khumaedi Teddy Khumaedi Institut Ummul Quro Al Islami, Bogor, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38073/wasilatuna.v8i02.2504

Keywords:

film, leadership, semiotics

Abstract

Humans were created by Allah on earth to be caliphs, therefore, humans must have the soul of a leader to be able to manage the environment, groups and even lead themselves. As time goes by, leadership messages can not only be obtained through Basic Leadership Training (LDK), but can also utilize technology such as mass media, one of which is communication media, namely film. Film is one of the mass media tools used to convey messages from sources to audiences. The aim of this research is to find out Roland Barthes' semiotic analysis which consists of Denotation, Connotation and Myth as well as what leadership messages are contained in the film Buya Hamka Season 1. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative with Roland Barthes' semiotic approach. The results of this research show that the film Buya Hamka Season 1 has various signs regarding leadership, both in verbal and non-verbal forms. Each scene has various leadership messages which are reflected through dialogue or scenes carried out by the characters. These scenes provide leadership messages and the leadership style used by the character Buya Hamka. The conclusion of this research is that there are signs of denotation, connotation, and myth that contain leadership messages as well as democratic, charismatic, transformational and paternalistic leadership styles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afdjani, Hadiono. (2014). Communication Science Process and Strategy. Tangerang: Indigo Media

Afif Hamka, At.all. (2008) Buya Hamka, South Jakarta: Uhamka Press.

Aini, Nafiah. (2020). The Relationship Between the Role of Humans as Caliphs and Environmental Damage from the Perspective of the Qur'an. Journal of Al-Qur'an and Hadith Studies, At-Tibyan 3(1).

Anggito, Albi and Johan Setiawan. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology. Sukabumi: CV Jejak

Asri, Rahman. Reading Film as a Text: Content Analysis of the Film Nanti Kita Cerita Tentang Hari Ini (NKCTHI).‘ Jurnal Al Azhar Indonesia Series of Social Sciences 1, no. 2 (August 29, 2020): 74

Aziz, Aulia Miftachul. (2019). Leadership Message in the Film Guru Bangsa Tjokroaminoto, Ponorogo: IAIN Ponorogo Thesis.

Erlangga, Heri. (2018). Leadership with the Spirit of Technopreneurship. Bandung: FISIP Unpas Press.

Hidayanto, Nurul. (2017). Umar Bin Khatab's Leadership Message (Semiotic Analysis of the Character Umar Bin Khatab in the Film 'Omar' Episode 22-24), Yogyakarta: UIN Sunan Kalijaga Thesis.

https://amp,kompas.com/hype/read/2023/11/28/164044766/film-buya-hamka-pertama sukses-laudya-cynthia-bella-dan-vino-g-bastian-tak. accessed on Friday, February 9, at 18.18 WIB

https://www.instagram.com/falconpictures_?igsh=MXdn0W45a29waHdmZQ==. accessed on Friday, February 9, at 18.22 WIB

https://www.kompasiana.com/ahmadkhoe123/652a9eeaee794a378c3860a2/rangkuman-dan sinopsis-film-buya-hamka-perjalanan-sinematik-dalam-kehidupan-seorang cendkiawan-ternama. accessed on Monday, January 15, 2024, at 20.20 WIB.

Irfandi, Muhamad Naufal. (2019). Leadership Communication in the Moneyball Film (Semiotic Analysis of the Roland Barthes Model), Surabaya: UIN Sunan Ampel Thesis.

Istiqomah, Lathifah. (2019). Analysis of Preaching Messages in the Film Duka Sedalam Cinta, Bengkulu: Thesis of the State Islamic Institute of Bengkulu.

Marhamah, Rahma Dani. (2024). Semiotic Analysis of Islamic Struggle Values in the Film Buya Hamka Volume 1. Riau: UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Thesis.

Mudjiono, Yoyon. (2011). Semiotic Study in Film. Journal of Communication Science. 1(1).

Mudjiyanto, Bambang, and Emilsyah Nur. Semiotics in Communication Research Methods.‖ Journal of Communication Research 16, no. 1 (2013).

Nurulita Danty Intan Pratiwi and Ida Afidah. Semiotic Analysis of Roland Barthes' Preaching Message in the Film Merindu Cahaya De Amstel Journal of Islamic Broadcasting Communication Research, December 21, 2022, 93–98.

Rijali, Ahmad. QUALITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS. Alhadharah: Journal of Preaching Science 17, no. 33 (January 2, 2019): 81.

Samudra, M.T Riksa. (2017). Representation of Leadership Style in Habibie's Character in the Film Habibie Ainun, Bandar Lampung: Thesis, University of Lampung.

Sari, Milya and Asmendri. Library Research in Science Education Research. Journal of Natural Science. 6(1).

Sobur, Alex. (2006). Media Text Analysis: An Introduction to Discourse Analysis, Semiotic Analysis, and Framing Analysis. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Sudaryono. (2014). Leadership Theory and Practice of Leadership. Central Jakarta: Lentera Ilmu Cendikia

Sugiyono. (2018). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta

Sumarti, Lilis. (2017). Analysis of the Content of Leadership Messages in the Film Rudy Habibie (Habibie & Ainun 2) by Hanung Bramantyo, Medan: Thesis, University of Muhammadiyah North Sumatra, Medan.

Suriagiri. (2020). Transformational Leadership. Lhokseumawe: CV. Radja Publika.

Agung Janitra Dewanta (2020) Semiotic Analysis in the Film Dua Garis Biru by Gina S.

Noer. Thesis, University of Lampung. Sari, Milya and Asmendri. Library Research in Science Education Research. Journal of Indonesian language education and learning. vol.9 no.1

Muhammad Ubadillah, mukhsin Patriansah (2024). Semiotic Analysis of Roland

Barthes in the Film "Agak Laen" Produced by Studio Imajinari. Library Research in Science Education Research. VisART Journal Journal of Fine Arts and Design. Vol 2 No.1

Niken Pambudiasih. (2023) Semiotic Analysis of Roland Barthes in the Film "Dunia

Tanpa Suara" Research in Science Education Research. Journal of Research in Educational Sciences, Language and Culture. Vol.1 no. 4

Amalia Hanifa, Laila Afifah, M. Zaki Mubarok, Nasichah. (2023). Semiotic Analysis in

Gara-gara Warisan. Research in Science Education Research. Journal of Communication Science and Social Media (JKOMDIS). Vol.3 no.2

Asnat Riwu, Tri Pujiati. (2018). Roland Barthes Analysis in the Film 3 Dara. Research in

Science Education Research. DeikSis Journal. Vol.10 no.03

Muhammad Yasin Harahap, Muhammad Alfikri. (2024). Roland Barthes Semiotic

Analysis in the Film Blackberry 2023. Research in Science Education Research. eSceince Humanity Journal. Vol. 4 no.2

Tegar Adhitama Dava Patria, Bagus Aji Pamungkas, Hafidz Asadullah. (2024). Analysis

of the Horror-Sweet Film; Roland Barthes Method Approach. AGUNA: Journal of Communication Science. Vol.5 no.1

Relivia Elsha Frisnataria, Maya May Syarah, Ade Budi Santoso. (2023) Semiotic Analysis

of the Film "The Menu": Disclosure of Denotative and Connotative Meanings. Research in Multidisciplinary Science Research Nusantara Journal of Multidisciplinary Science. Vol.1 no.3

Alisha Husaina, Putri Ekaresty Haes, Nuning Endah Pratiwi, Putu Ratna Juwita. (2018)

Analysis of the Film Coco in Roland Barthes' Semiotic Theory Research in Multidisciplinary Science Research. Scientific Journal of Social Dynamics

. Vol.2 no.2

Ahmad Rifandi Batubara, Nugroho Widi Pratomo. (2024) Semiotic Analysis of Roland

Barthes in the Film Mencuri Raden Saleh by Angga Dwimas Sasongko. Research in Science Education Research. Tambusai Education Journal. Vol.8 no.1

Downloads

Published

05-08-2025 — Updated on 26-12-2025

Versions

26-12-2025 (2)
05-08-2025 (1)

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 02 (2025): Wasilatuna: Jurnal Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam

Section

Articles

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Use of Large Language Models and Generative AI in Manuscript Preparation

Wasilatuna: Journal of Islamic Communication and Broadcasting recognizes that generative artificial intelligence technologies, including Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, may serve as supportive tools in the preparation of scholarly manuscripts. These technologies may assist authors in developing initial ideas, organizing arguments, summarizing materials, paraphrasing texts, and improving linguistic quality.

However, generative AI systems do not possess human judgment, ethical reasoning, or critical reflection. Therefore, all outputs produced with the assistance of AI must remain under the full control, evaluation, and responsibility of the authors. To safeguard academic integrity, authors using LLMs are required to observe the following principles:

Objectivity
AI-generated text may reflect biases embedded in its training data, including social, cultural, gender, or ideological bias. Certain perspectives especially minority or marginalized viewpoints may be underrepresented. Because AI outputs are decontextualized, such biases may not always be immediately visible.

Scientific accuracy
LLMs may generate inaccurate, misleading, or incomplete information, particularly when dealing with complex, interdisciplinary, or ambiguous topics. AI systems can produce statements that sound plausible but are not scientifically valid, including incorrect facts or fabricated references.

Contextual limitations
AI tools have limited ability to interpret nuanced human communication, such as irony, metaphor, humor, or culturally specific expressions. This limitation may result in misinterpretations or inappropriate formulations in scholarly writing.

Training data constraints
The reliability of generative AI depends on the availability and quality of training data. In some academic fields, languages, or regional contexts, data scarcity may reduce the usefulness and accuracy of AI-generated output.

Guidelines for Authors

Authors who use generative AI in the preparation of their manuscripts must:

Disclose the use of AI tools
Authors must clearly state whether generative AI was used, identify the specific tool or model, and explain its purpose. This information should be included in the Methods section or Acknowledgments, as appropriate.
Provide a formal declaration of AI use
A disclosure statement must be added at the end of the main manuscript, before the References list, under a separate heading titled:
“Declaration of AI and AI-Assisted Technologies in the Writing Process.”

The statement should follow this format:

During the preparation of this manuscript, the author(s) used [NAME OF TOOL / SERVICE] for the purpose of [PURPOSE]. After using this tool, the author(s) reviewed, edited, and verified all content and take full responsibility for the integrity of the publication.

This declaration is not required when only basic tools such as grammar checkers, spell checkers, or reference managers are used.

Verify all content and references
Authors are fully responsible for checking the accuracy, validity, and scholarly appropriateness of all text, data, and citations generated or assisted by AI.
Validate all sources
Any references suggested or generated by AI must be verified against original sources and formatted according to accepted academic standards.
Avoid plagiarism
Because generative AI may reproduce or closely resemble existing texts, authors must conduct originality checks and ensure proper citation of all sources.
Acknowledge the limitations of AI
Authors should remain aware of potential bias, error, or knowledge gaps in AI-generated material.
Respect authorship standards
AI tools, including ChatGPT, must not be listed as authors or co-authors of any manuscript.

Failure to disclose the use of generative AI may result in corrective or disciplinary action in accordance with the journal’s ethical policies.

Responsibilities of Editors and Reviewers

The integrity of editorial decision-making and peer review is fundamental to scholarly publishing. Therefore, Wasilatuna establishes clear ethical boundaries regarding the use of generative AI.

For reviewers
All manuscripts under review are confidential. Reviewers must not upload, share, or process manuscripts or review reports using generative AI tools. Using AI to draft, structure, or assist in peer-review reports is prohibited. Peer review requires expert human judgment and cannot be delegated to machines.

For editors
Manuscripts, editorial correspondence, and decision letters must remain confidential and must not be entered into generative AI systems, including for language editing. Editorial decisions must be based solely on the professional evaluation of the editor.

AI tools may be used only for limited technical purposes, such as plagiarism detection or formatting checks, provided that they do not directly process the scholarly content and operate within secure, approved systems that comply with data protection and ethical standards.

If there is reasonable suspicion of undisclosed or inappropriate use of generative AI by authors or reviewers, the editor must initiate an investigation in accordance with the journal’s governance procedures.

Although emerging technologies can support academic work, the evaluation of scientific quality and editorial judgment remains a fundamentally human responsibility.

Further Information

Wasilatuna: Journal of Islamic Communication and Broadcasting refers to the recommendations of the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) regarding authorship and the use of artificial intelligence tools in scholarly publishing.

This policy may be updated as technologies and publishing practices evolve.

Editorial Team
Reviewers
Focus and Scope
Author Guidelines
Publication Ethics
Open Access Policy
Peer Review Process
Online Submissions
Indexing Site
Journal Statistics
Contact
Author Fees

Leadership Message in Buya Hamka Movie Season 1 (Semiotic Analysis of Leadership Message in Buya Hamka Movie Season 1)

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

Downloads

References

Downloads

Published

Versions

Issue

Section

License

Sertifikat Sinta

menusidebar

Collaboration

template

intruksi

contact_us

identitas

browseby

visitors

Keywords

ChatGPT and Generative AI

Use of Large Language Models and Generative AI in Manuscript Preparation

Guidelines for Authors

Responsibilities of Editors and Reviewers

Further Information