Peer Review Process
All submitted manuscripts are subject to a peer-review process involving at least two independent reviewers under a double-blind review system. The acceptance or rejection of a manuscript is determined by the Editor-in-Chief based on the reviewers’ evaluations discussed during an editorial board meeting. In addition, all manuscripts undergo plagiarism screening using Turnitin software.
REVIEW PROCESS:
- Manuscripts approved by the editorial board are forwarded to the reviewers.
- The review process is conducted within a specified timeframe, generally averaging one month; any request for additional time must be communicated to the editorial secretariat.
- Throughout the review process, reviewers adhere to the journal’s prescribed writing style guidelines.
- Reviewers carefully examine the substance of the manuscript to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the conveyed information.
- Reviewers assess the relevance and correctness of in-text citations and the accompanying reference list or bibliography.
- Reviewers provide clear written comments and recommendations aimed at improving the quality of the manuscript.
- The completed review results are submitted to the Editor-in-Chief or Managing Editor through the official Review Form.
