Teaching Arabic Speaking through Concise Daily Expressions: Evidence from Two Indonesian Secondary Schools

Authors

  • Ahmad Harzaqil Universitas Islam Internasional Darullughah Wadda'wah, Pasuruan
  • Mustahar Ali Wardana Universitas Islam Internasional Darullughah Wadda'wah, Pasuruan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38073/lughawiyyat.v5i2.5666

Keywords:

Arabic speaking skills, comparative case study, concise daily expressions, formulaic language, instructional materials

Abstract

Concise daily expressions can bridge the gap between learners’ knowledge of Arabic vocabulary and grammar and their ability to communicate orally. This study examined the implementation of Kitāb al-‘Ibārāt al-Yaumiyyah al-Mūjazah in Arabic speaking instruction at Al-Khayriyyah Islamic Institute and Tihamah School in Cirebon, West Java. A qualitative comparative case-study design was employed, with data collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis. The data were analysed thematically through coding, categorization, within-case interpretation, and cross-case comparison. The findings revealed that both institutions used the book through explanation, teacher modelling, guided repetition, pronunciation correction, dialogue practice, and contextual speaking activities. Al-Khayriyyah integrated the expressions more systematically into daily Arabic routines, whereas Tihamah extended them through group conversations, speeches, public speaking, and dramatic performances. In both settings, the expressions helped students initiate speech, participate more actively, and develop greater confidence in oral interaction. Their effectiveness, however, depended on teacher mediation, institutional language environments, practice opportunities, learner readiness, time allocation, and supporting resources. Limited instructional time, differences in comprehension, and insufficient supplementary materials were the main constraints. The study concludes that concise daily expressions function most effectively as linguistic scaffolds when learners progress from memorization toward contextual substitution, interaction, and independent communication. The findings contribute a comparative institutional perspective to Arabic speaking pedagogy and highlight the importance of transforming formulaic expressions into flexible communicative resources.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Creswell, John W., and Cheryl N. Poth. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2018.

Cypress, Brigitte S. “Rigor or Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Strategies, Reconceptualization, and Recommendations.” Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing 36, no. 4 (July 2017): 253–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000253.

Foster, Pauline. “Oral Fluency in a Second Language: A Research Agenda for the next Ten Years.” Language Teaching 53, no. 4 (October 2020): 446–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144482000018X.

François, Jennifer, and Mohammed Albakry. “Effect of Formulaic Sequences on Fluency of English Learners in Standardized Speaking Tests.” Language Learning & Technology 25, no. 2 (June 2021): 26–41. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73429.

Goh, Christine C. M. “Research into Practice: Scaffolding Learning Processes to Improve Speaking Performance.” Language Teaching 50, no. 2 (April 2017): 247–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000483.

Hendri, Muspika. “Pembelajaran Keterampilan Berbicara Bahasa Arab Melalui Pendekatan Komunkatif.” Potensia : Jurnal Kependidikan Islam 3, no. 2 (December 2017): 196. https://doi.org/10.24014/potensia.v3i2.3929.

Hoang, Hien, and Frank Boers. “Re-Telling a Story in a Second Language: How Well Do Adult Learners Mine an Input Text for Multiword Expressions?” Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 6, no. 3 (September 2016): 513–35. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.3.7.

Jauharoh, Ervin, Wahidul Anam, and Mokhammad Miftakhul Huda. “The Use of Expressions in Improving Kalam Skill in Learning Arabic for MTSN 2 Kediri Students.” Asalibuna 5, no. 02 (December 2021): 53–61. https://doi.org/10.30762/asalibuna.v5i02.586.

Jong, Nivja H. De. “Fluency in Second Language Testing: Insights From Different Disciplines.” Language Assessment Quarterly 15, no. 3 (July 2018): 237–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2018.1477780.

Kallio, Hanna, Anna‐Maija Pietilä, Martin Johnson, and Mari Kangasniemi. “Systematic Methodological Review: Developing a Framework for a Qualitative Semi‐structured Interview Guide.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 72, no. 12 (December 2016): 2954–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031.

Khajavy, Gholam Hassan, Peter D. MacIntyre, and Elyas Barabadi. “ROLE OF THE EMOTIONS AND CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT IN WILLINGNESS TO COMMUNICATE: APPLYING DOUBLY LATENT MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION RESEARCH.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40, no. 3 (September 2018): 605–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000304.

Lambert, Craig, Judit Kormos, and Danny Minn. “TASK REPETITION AND SECOND LANGUAGE SPEECH PROCESSING.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39, no. 1 (March 2017): 167–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000085.

Loewen, Shawn, and Masatoshi Sato. “Interaction and Instructed Second Language Acquisition.” Language Teaching 51, no. 3 (July 2018): 285–329. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000125.

Mamnunah, Mamnunah, Syihabuddin Syihabuddin, and Yayan Nurbayan. “Policy Implementation Of The Sabilillah Spectacular Stage (Sss) Program To Increase Students’ Speaking Skills.” Arabiyat : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Dan Kebahasaaraban 8, no. 1 (June 2021): 106–17. https://doi.org/10.15408/a.v8i1.20661.

Miles, Matthew B., A. Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldaña. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2020.

Nergis, Aysegul. “Can Explicit Instruction of Formulaic Sequences Enhance L2 Oral Fluency?” Lingua 255 (May 2021): 103072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103072.

Nowell, Lorelli S., Jill M. Norris, Deborah E. White, and Nancy J. Moules. “Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16, no. 1 (December 2017): 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847.

Philp, Jenefer, and Susan Duchesne. “Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36 (March 2016): 50–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000094.

Plonsky, Luke, and YouJin Kim. “Task-Based Learner Production: A Substantive and Methodological Review.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36 (March 2016): 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190516000015.

Saito, Kazuya, Pavel Trofimovich, and Talia Isaacs. “Second Language Speech Production: Investigating Linguistic Correlates of Comprehensibility and Accentedness for Learners at Different Ability Levels.” Applied Psycholinguistics 37, no. 2 (March 2016): 217–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000502.

Sato, Masatoshi, and Kim McDonough. “Practice Is Important But How About Its Quality?: Contextualized Practice In The Classroom.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41, no. 5 (December 2019): 999–1026. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000159.

Sutaman, Sutaman, and Suci Ramadhanti Febriani. “Optimizing Arabic Speaking Skills Based On Integration Of Learning Theory Framework In Higher Education,.” Arabiyat : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Dan Kebahasaaraban 8, no. 1 (June 2021): 75–89. https://doi.org/10.15408/a.v8i1.20423.

Suzuki, Yuichi, Tatsuya Nakata, and Robert Dekeyser. “Optimizing Second Language Practice in the Classroom: Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology.” The Modern Language Journal 103, no. 3 (September 2019): 551–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12582.

———. “The Desirable Difficulty Framework as a Theoretical Foundation for Optimizing and Researching Second Language Practice.” The Modern Language Journal 103, no. 3 (September 2019): 713–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12585.

Syaifullah, Muhammad, and Nailul Izzah. “Kajian Teoritis Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Bahasa Arab.” Arabiyatuna : Jurnal Bahasa Arab 3, no. 1 (May 2019): 127. https://doi.org/10.29240/jba.v3i1.764.

Tavakoli, Parvaneh, Colin Campbell, and Joan McCormack. “Development of Speech Fluency Over a Short Period of Time: Effects of Pedagogic Intervention.” TESOL Quarterly 50, no. 2 (June 2016): 447–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.244.

Tavakoli, Parvaneh, and Takumi Uchihara. “To What Extent Are Multiword Sequences Associated With Oral Fluency?” Language Learning 70, no. 2 (June 2020): 506–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12384.

Teimouri, Yasser, Julia Goetze, and Luke Plonsky. “SECOND LANGUAGE ANXIETY AND ACHIEVEMENT: A META-ANALYSIS.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41, no. 2 (May 2019): 363–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263118000311.

Thai, Chau, and Frank Boers. “Repeating a Monologue Under Increasing Time Pressure: Effects on Fluency, Complexity, and Accuracy.” TESOL Quarterly 50, no. 2 (June 2016): 369–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.232.

Yan, Xun. “Unpacking the Relationship Between Formulaic Sequences and Speech Fluency on Elicited Imitation Tasks: Proficiency Level, Sentence Length, and Fluency Dimensions.” TESOL Quarterly 54, no. 2 (June 2020): 460–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.556.

Zulharby, Puti, Yumna Rasyid, and Nuruddin Nuruddin. “The Characteristics of Teaching Material Arabic Speaking Skills in Higher Education.” Jurnal Al-Bayan: Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab 11, no. 2 (December 2019): 194–213. https://doi.org/10.24042/albayan.v11i2.5175.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-25

How to Cite

Harzaqil, A., & Wardana, M. A. (2022). Teaching Arabic Speaking through Concise Daily Expressions: Evidence from Two Indonesian Secondary Schools. Lughawiyyat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Arab, 5(2), 162–182. https://doi.org/10.38073/lughawiyyat.v5i2.5666