Al-Ṣarf al-Muyassar for Arabic Morphology Learning: Effects on Speaking and Reading Skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38073/lughawiyyat.v6i2.5660Keywords:
Arabic morphology, Arabic reading, Arabic speaking, Al-Ṣarf al-Muyassar, morphology instructionAbstract
Arabic morphology is often taught through rule memorization and conjugational paradigms, although its contribution to speaking and reading requires further empirical examination. This study investigated the implementation and effectiveness of Al-Ṣarf al-Muyassar: Taqrīb Lāmiyyat al-Afʿāl in improving students’ Arabic speaking and reading skills. A quantitative quasi-experimental design with a pretest–posttest control group was employed. The participants were 40 second-year secondary students at Darullughah Wadda’wah Islamic Boarding School, Bangil, Indonesia, divided into an experimental group and a control group of 20 students each. The experimental group received morphology instruction through simplified rules, root-and-pattern analysis, tables, guided exercises, reading activities, and oral sentence production, while the control group received conventional morphology instruction. Data were collected through speaking and reading tests, classroom observation, and teacher interviews. The experimental group’s mean score increased from 68.5 to 85.8, whereas the control group improved from 68.2 to 74.6. The posttest difference was statistically significant (p = .001), indicating that Al-Ṣarf al-Muyassar-based instruction produced stronger combined speaking and reading outcomes. The findings suggest that Arabic morphology becomes more effective when structural knowledge is connected with contextualized reading and oral production. This study contributes evidence that simplified and application-oriented morphology instruction can transform ṣarf from a memorized body of rules into a functional foundation for receptive and productive Arabic skills in an Indonesian Islamic boarding-school context.
Downloads
References
Akbulut, Fatma Demiray. “The Contribution of Morphological Instruction to Morphological Awareness and Reading: An Integrative Experiment on Turkish EFL Learners.” International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, July 1, 2019, 263–78. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.558986.
Amirjalili, Forough, and Ali Akbar Jabbari. “The Impact of Morphological Instruction on Morphological Awareness and Reading Comprehension of EFL Learners.” Cogent Education 5, no. 1 (January 2018): 1523975. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1523975.
Appelbaum, Mark, Harris Cooper, Rex B. Kline, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Arthur M. Nezu, and Stephen M. Rao. “Journal Article Reporting Standards for Quantitative Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report.” American Psychologist 73, no. 1 (January 2018): 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000191.
Ary, Donald, Lucy Cheser Jacobs, Christine K. Sorensen Irvine, and David A. Walker. Introduction to Research in Education. 10th ed. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning, 2018. https://www.cengage.com/c/introduction-to-research-in-education-10e-ary-jacobs-sorensen-walker/9781337566001/.
Asaad, Hani Qasem Mohammed, and Ahmad Affendi Shabdi̇N. “The Predictive Role of Morphological Awareness and Productive Vocabulary Knowledge in L2 Postgraduate Students’ Academic Writing.” Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, April 8, 2021, 24–44. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.911149.
Bar-On, Amalia, Yasmin Shalhoub-Awwad, and Reem Ibraheem Tuma-Basila. “Contribution of Phonological and Morphological Information in Reading Arabic: A Developmental Perspective.” Applied Psycholinguistics 39, no. 6 (November 2018): 1253–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716418000310.
British Educational Research Association. Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. 4th ed. London: British Educational Research Association, 2018. https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018.
Brown, H. Douglas, and Priyanvada Abeywickrama. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Pearson Education, 2019.
Cohen, Louis, Lawrence Manion, and Keith Morrison. Research Methods in Education. 8th ed. London: Routledge, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539.
Collins, Laura, and June Ruivivar. “Research Agenda: Researching Grammar Teaching and Learning in the Second Language Classroom.” Language Teaching 54, no. 3 (July 2021): 407–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444821000070.
Creswell, John W., and J. David Creswell. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, 2018. https://www.sagepub.com/shop/buy-a-book/research-design-5-255675.
DeVellis, Robert F. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. 4th ed. Applied Social Research Methods. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, 2017. https://collegepublishing.sagepub.com/products/scale-development-4-246123.
Field, Andy. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 5th ed. London: SAGE Publications, 2018.
Ke, Sihui (Echo), and Dongbo Zhang. “Morphological Instruction and Reading Development in Young L2 Readers: A Scoping Review of Causal Relationships.” Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 11, no. 3 (September 2021): 331–50. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.3.2.
Kotzer, Maddie, John R. Kirby, and Lindsay Heggie. “Morphological Awareness Predicts Reading Comprehension in Adults.” Reading Psychology 42, no. 3 (April 2021): 302–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1888362.
Layes, Smail, Amel Kaddouri, Robert Lalonde, and Mohamed Rebai. “Effects of Morphological Awareness Training on Reading Accuracy in Children with Dyslexia and Its Transfer Effect on Phonological Awareness.” Journal of International Special Needs Education 24, no. 2 (December 2021): 66–75. https://doi.org/10.9782/JISNE-D-19-00023.
Li, Yi-syuan, and Shu-hui Chen. “Relative Effectiveness of Phonological and Morphological Awareness Training on L2 Word Reading in EFL Children.” System 60 (August 2016): 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.06.005.
Loewen, Shawn. Introduction to Instructed Second Language Acquisition. 2nd ed. Routledge, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315616797.
Rastle, Kathleen. “The Place of Morphology in Learning to Read in English.” Cortex 116 (July 2019): 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.02.008.
Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor. “MAWRID: A Model of Arabic Word Reading in Development.” Journal of Learning Disabilities 51, no. 5 (September 2018): 454–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219417720460.
Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor, and Rachel Schiff. “The Impact of Diglossia on Voweled and Unvoweled Word Reading in Arabic: A Developmental Study From Childhood to Adolescence.” Scientific Studies of Reading 20, no. 4 (July 2016): 311–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2016.1180526.
Sato, Masatoshi, and Kim McDonough. “Practice Is Important But How About Its Quality?: Contextualized Practice In The Classroom.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41, no. 5 (December 2019): 999–1026. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000159.
Schiff, Rachel, and Elinor Saiegh-Haddad. “Development and Relationships Between Phonological Awareness, Morphological Awareness and Word Reading in Spoken and Standard Arabic.” Frontiers in Psychology 9 (April 2018): 356. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00356.
Shalhoub-Awwad, Yasmin, and Mark Leikin. “The Lexical Status of the Root in Processing Morphologically Complex Words in Arabic.” Scientific Studies of Reading 20, no. 4 (July 2016): 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2016.1180525.
Stoffelsma, Lieke, Wilbert Spooren, Isaac N. Mwinlaaru, and Victor Antwi. “The Morphology-Vocabulary- Reading Mechanism and Its Effect on Students’ Academic Achievement in an English L2 Context.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 47 (September 2020): 100887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100887.
Tabachnick, Barbara G., and Linda S. Fidell. Using Multivariate Statistics. 7th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson, 2019.
Taha, Haitham, and Elinor Saiegh-Haddad. “The Role of Phonological versus Morphological Skills in the Development of Arabic Spelling: An Intervention Study.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 45, no. 3 (June 2016): 507–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9362-6.
Tibi, Sana, Ashley A. Edwards, Christopher Schatschneider, and John R. Kirby. “Predicting Arabic Word Reading: A Cross-Classified Generalized Random-Effects Analysis Showing the Critical Role of Morphology.” Annals of Dyslexia 70, no. 2 (July 2020): 200–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-020-00193-y.
Tibi, Sana, and John R. Kirby. “Morphological Awareness: Construct and Predictive Validity in Arabic.” Applied Psycholinguistics 38, no. 5 (September 2017): 1019–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716417000029.
Tibi, Sana, Jamie L. Tock, and John R. Kirby. “The Development of a Measure of Root Awareness to Account for Reading Performance in the Arabic Language: A Development and Validation Study.” Applied Psycholinguistics 40, no. 2 (March 2019): 303–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716418000589.
Tomlinson, Brian, and Hitomi Masuhara. The Complete Guide to the Theory and Practice of Materials Development for Language Learning. 1st ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2018.
Vaknin-Nusbaum, Vered, and Elinor Saiegh-Haddad. “The Contribution of Morphological Awareness to Reading Comprehension in Arabic-Speaking Second Graders.” Reading and Writing 33, no. 10 (December 2020): 2413–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10048-y.
Wasserstein, Ronald L., and Nicole A. Lazar. “The ASA Statement on p -Values: Context, Process, and Purpose.” The American Statistician 70, no. 2 (April 2016): 129–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 M. Adlika, Menik Mahmudah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




