Atsaru Ta’lῑmi ‘Ilmi Al-Lughati Al- āli Nahwi Dawāfi’i Al-Thalabati Fi Ta’lῑmi Al-Lughati Al-‘Arabiyyati

Authors

  • Azisi STAI Nurul Huda Kapongan Situbondo
  • Ria Syafitri STAI Nurul Huda Kapongan Situbondo
  • Nurfaiza STAI Ahmad Sibawayhie Besuki Situbondo
  • Mohd Shauki Bik Bin Mohd Kasim Maktab Mahmud Yan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38073/lughawiyyat.v5i1.1394

Keywords:

Arabic language learning, motivational, IT-based

Abstract

The background of this research is related to the motivation to learn Arabic in students using information technology. This aims to identify the impact of IT-based Arabic language learning on stimulating student learning. In this study, the researchers used quantitative methods, and this type of research is field research. Observational data collection methods, questionnaires and documentaries use data analysis using product torque codes. The results of this study are divided into two parts, namely the main findings and the sub-results. The main finding was that there was an effect of automated language teaching on students' motivation in teaching Arabic, but the effect was low, the known arithmetic r (0.3301) was greater than rtabular (0.2311) of the sum n = 80, db = n - nr = 78, (α) = 5%. This indicates that the null hypothesis (H0) is returned and the hypothesis of option (H1) is acceptable.  The secondary outcomes are: a) the effect of automated language teaching on students' internal motivation in teaching Arabic is low, arithmetic r (0.2647) is greater than rtabular (0.2311) of the sum n = 80, db = n-nr = 78, (α) = 5%. This indicates that the null hypothesis (H0) is returned and the hypothesis of option (H1) is acceptable. b) The effect of automated language teaching on the external motivation of students in teaching Arabic is also low, it is known that the calculation r (0.2359) is greater than rtabular (0.2311) of the sum n = 80, db = n - nr = 78, (α) = 5%. This indicates that the null hypothesis (H0) is returned and the hypothesis of option (H1) is acceptable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A, Sardiman. Interaksi & Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2006.

Abdul hamid, dkk. Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab, Pendekatan, Metode, Strategi, Materi Dan Media. Malang: UIN-Malang Press, 2008.

Abdullah, Ibrahim, Asma’ Ammar, Muhamad Zaidi Zakaria, Muhammad Arsyad Abdul Majid, and Abdul Azim Muhamad Isa. “Pengaruh Pendekatan Mass Lecture Dan Motivasi Terhadap Kepuasan Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Komunikasi.” Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH) 6, no. 10 (2021): 90–107. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i10.1062.

Hamidi, Kurniawan, Wan Jamaluddin, Koderi Koderi, and Erlina Erlina. “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Berbasis Video Animasi Interaktif Untuk Siswa Madrasah Aliyah.” Journal on Education 5, no. 2 (2023): 5289–96. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i2.1098.

Illahi, Nur. “Peranan Guru Profesional Dalam Peningkatan Prestasi Siswa Dan Mutu Pendidikan Di Era Milenial.” Jurnal Asy-Syukriyyah 21, no. 1 (2020): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.36769/asy.v21i1.94.

John W. Creswell. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Ed. Vicki Knight, News.Ge, 4th Ed. California, London, New Delhi, Singapore: Sage, 2014.

Lestari, Silviana Devi, and Binti Maunah. “Dasar - Dasar Yuridis Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.” Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar 9, no. 3 (2022): 193. https://doi.org/10.19184/jipsd.v9i3.31876.

Mahmudah, Nurhapsari Pradnya Paramita. “Transformasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Di Era Digital: Tantangan Dan Peluang Dalam Pendidikan.” In Ruqmana Al-Lughah al-Arabiyah Fii Dhaui as-Siyasah al-Lughawiyah al-Hadifah. Mataram: Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2023.

Marie-Therese Puth, Markus Neuhäuser, Graeme D. Ruxton. “Effective Use of Pearson’s Product–Moment Correlation Coefficient.” Animal Behaviour 93, no. Juli (2014): 183–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.05.003.

Maritsa, Ana, Unik Hanifah Salsabila, Muhammad Wafiq, Putri Rahma Anindya, and Muhammad Azhar Ma’shum. “Pengaruh Teknologi Dalam Dunia Pendidikan.” Al-Mutharahah: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Sosial Keagamaan 18, no. 2 (2021): 91–100. https://doi.org/10.46781/al-mutharahah.v18i2.303.

Munip, Abdul. “Tantangan Dan Prospek Studi Bahasa Arab Di Indonesia.” Al Mahāra: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab 5, no. 2 (2020): 303–18. https://doi.org/10.14421/almahara.2019.052.08.

Nooriskya, Annisa. “Perkembangan Teori Motivasi” 2, no. 4 (2022): 1–10.

Sarwan. Belajar & Pembelajaran. Jember: STAI Press, 2013.

Setiyadi, Alif Cahya. “Bahasa Dan Berbahasa Perspektif Psikolinguistik.” At-Ta’dib 4, no. 2 (2009): 167–89.

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2018.

Suryani, Repi Mei, Fachrur Razi Amir, and Lilis Fauziah Balgis. “Efektivitas Metode Audiolingual Dalam Peningkatan Maharah Al-Kalam Bahasa Arab.” Tatsqifiy: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab 3, no. 1 (2022): 47–56. https://doi.org/10.30997/tjpba.v3i1.4964.

Zamroni, Umarso dan. Pendidikan Kebebasan Dalam Perspektif Barat & Timur. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media, 2011.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-08

How to Cite

Azisi, Syafitri, R., Nurfaiza, & Mohd Shauki Bik Bin Mohd Kasim. (2022). Atsaru Ta’lῑmi ‘Ilmi Al-Lughati Al- āli Nahwi Dawāfi’i Al-Thalabati Fi Ta’lῑmi Al-Lughati Al-‘Arabiyyati. Lughawiyyat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Arab, 5(1), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.38073/lughawiyyat.v5i1.1394