LEGALITAS WARIS LINTAS RELIGI PERSPEKTIF YUSUF AL-QARAḌAWĪ DAN ‘ABD ALLĀH AḤMED AL-NA‘ĪM DITINJAU DARI MAQĀṢID SHARĪ‘AH IMAM AL-GHAZĀLĪ

Indonesia

Authors

  • Shaka Danendra Ramadheni Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Fahruddin Ali Sabri Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38073/rasikh.v13i2.1847

Keywords:

Inheritance Between Religions, Yusuf Al-Qaraḍawī, ‘Abd Allāh Aḥmed Al-Na‘Īm, Maqāṣid Sharī‘Ah Imam Al-Ghazālī

Abstract

Raf‘ al-ḥaraj as an effort to remove hardship from a matter that is considered excessive for the soul, body, or property, either now or in the future. This study emphasizes to find the method of istinbāṭ, the foundation of legal istinbāṭ, and the analysis of the opinion of the legality of cross-religious inheritance of al-Qaraḍawī and al-Na'īm in the corridor of maqāṣid sharī‘ah of Imam al-Ghazālī. This research is a normative legal study with a library research approach to the book Fatwa-Fatwa Kontemporer volume 3 by Yusuf al-Qaraḍawī and the book Dekonstruksi Syari’ah: Wacana Kebebasan Sipil, HAM, dan Hubungan Internasional dalam Islam by ‘Abd Allāh Aḥmed al-Na‘īm. The study found that: first, al-Qaraḍawī uses the legal istinbāṭ approach of qiyās, maṣlaḥah mursalah, and the Hanafi school of thought on the interpretation of the connotation of kafir; while al-Na‘īm chooses to use reverse nasakh. Secondly, state policy and the social context of Muslim minorities influenced al-Qaraḍawī in issuing ijtihad on the legitimacy of inter-religious inheritance, while al-Na‘īm was motivated by the social context of his country and the death of his teacher, Mahmud Taha. In addition, it can be seen that in forming their opinions on the legitimacy of inter-religious inheritance, both figures strongly consider ḥifẓ al-dīn, ḥifẓ al-nafs, and ḥifẓ al-māl. This research is expected to contribute to offering a new perspective on Islamic law in the corridor of societal pluralism through maqāṣid sharī‘ah analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, Sundas. British Muslims in Numbers: A Demographic, Socio-Economic and Health Profile of Muslims in Britain Drawing on The 2011 Census. London: The Muslim Council of Britain, 2015. https://mcb.org.uk/resources/british-muslims-in-numbers/.

Al-Na‘īm, ‘Abd Allāh Aḥmed. Dekonstruksi Syari’ah: Wacana Kebebasan Sipil, HAM, Dan Hubungan Internasional Dalam Islam. Translated by Ahmad Suaedy and Amirudin ar-Rany. Yogyakarta: LKiS, 1994.

Azmi, Fatin Afiqah Md. “A Review and Preliminary Evaluation of Malaysian Estates Distribution Process.” Jurnal LAND 4, no. 1 (2023).

Baliza, Siti. “Pemikiran Yusuf Al-Qardhawi Tentang Ikhtiar (Dalam Kitab Halal Haram Fil Islam).” Skripsi, UIN Sultan Syarif Kasium, 2011.

Citizens Advice. “Who Can Inherit If There Is No Will - The Rules of Intestacy,” 2024. https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/family/death-and-wills/who-can-inherit-if-there-is-no-will-the-rules-of-intestacy/.

Darmawan. Hukum Kewarisan Islam. Surabaya: IMTIYAZ, 2018. http://repository.uinsa.ac.id/id/eprint/1189/1/Darmawan_Hukum%20Kewarisan.pdf.

Fahimah, Iim. Praktik Kewarisan Beda Agama Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo, 2021.

Freeman, Colin. “Inheritance Law In The UK: Rules of Inheritance Explained,” 2024. https://www.fjsolicitors.co.uk/inheritance-law-in-the-uk/.

Helwida, Novi. “Hukum Waris Beda Agama (Studi Perbandingan Ibn Taimiyah Dan Wahbah al-Zuhaili).” Skripsi, UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, 2017.

Ibrahim, Duski. Al-Qawā‘id al-Fiqhiyyah. Palembang: CV. Amanah, 2019.

Khoir, Tholkhatul. “Ideologi Dan Utopia Pemberlakuan Hukum Islam: Studi Pemikiran Abdullahi Ahmed an-Na’im Pendekatan Sosiologi Pengetahuan.” Asy-Syir’ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum 45, no. 2 (2011).

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. “Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.” Accessed August 31, 2024. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/search.html?q=wajibah&jenis_doc=putusan&cat=a28ae04e55e1f8c13005da77edbee894&jd=AMAR_LAINNYA&tp=0&court=401240PA801+++++++++++++++++++++&t_put=&t_reg=&t_upl=&t_pr=.

Martimer, Edwar. Islam Dan Kekuasaan. Translated by Enna Hadi and Rahmani Astuti. 1st ed. Bandung: Mizan, 1984.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Group, 2007.

Mulyadi. “Analisis Pemikiran Abdullah Ahmad An-Na’im Tentang Kewarisan Beda Agama Dan Relevansinya Dengan Hukum Kewarisan Di Indonesia.” Tesis, UIN Raden Intan, 2019.

Mutmainnah, and Rahmawati. “Eksistensi Dan Reformasi Hukum Keluarga Islam Di Inggris.” Diktum: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum 18, no. 2 (2020).

Nurdiansyah, Rizki, and Muhammad Adam Damiri. “Hukum Tentang Orang (Perbandingan Antara KUH Perdata Indonesia, Inggris, Dan Amerika).” Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi Negara 1, no. 4 (2023).

Qaraḍawī, Yusuf al-. Fatwa-Fatwa Kontemporer. Vol. 3. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 2002.

———. Perjalanan Hidupku I. Translated by Cecep Taufikurrahman. Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar, 2003.

Sabri, Fahruddin Ali. “Konsep Raf’ al-Haraj Dalam Perspektif Ushul Fiqih.” Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial 9, no. 1 (2014). https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v9i1.356.

Salikin, Adang Djumhur. Reformasi Syari’ah Dan HAM Dalam Islam Bacaan Kritis Terhadap Pemikiran An-Na’im. Yogyakarta: Gama Media, 2004.

“Sudan Population 2024.” World Population Review, 2024. https://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/sudan.

Usman, Muh Ilham. “Studi Komparasi K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Dan Abdullah Ahmad an-Naim Tentang Liberasi Dan Humanisasi.” Al-Fikr 17, no. 2 (2013).

Zuḥaylī, Wahbah al-. Tafsir Al-Munīr: Aqidah, Syari’ah, Manhaj. Vol. 3. Jakarta: Gema Insani, 2016.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-01

How to Cite

Ramadheni, Shaka Danendra, and Fahruddin Ali Sabri. 2024. “LEGALITAS WARIS LINTAS RELIGI PERSPEKTIF YUSUF AL-QARAḌAWĪ DAN ‘ABD ALLĀH AḤMED AL-NA‘ĪM DITINJAU DARI MAQĀṢID SHARĪ‘AH IMAM AL-GHAZĀLĪ: Indonesia”. Al-Rasῑkh: Jurnal Hukum Islam 13 (2):207-24. https://doi.org/10.38073/rasikh.v13i2.1847.